98% of Babies Are Breastfed in Bangladesh — Does That Mean There Are No Booby Traps?

Breastfeeding Moms in Bangladesh

According to the WHO Global Data Bank on Infant and Young Child Feeding, 98% of babies in Bangladesh are breastfed and the average age of weaning is 33 months. Dig even deeper and you’ll see that 95% of one year olds are still being breastfed as are 91% of two year olds.

Westerners who look at those statistics generally have one of two reactions:

Wow…that is amazing. We have so much to learn from them on creating a society that is supportive of breastfeeding.

or

Of course the breastfeeding rates are so high. Women are forced to breastfeed because they can’t afford formula and babies whose moms don’t breastfeed end up dying. Just look at the infant mortality rate. 

Which of those reactions is the correct one? From what I’ve seen, it is probably a bit of both.

Last month, I had the life changing opportunity to go to Bangladesh with Save the Children Canada. I was invited to visit their mother and child health and nutrition programs (MaMoni), as well as some of their education programs.

The program staff seemed almost bewildered when we persisted on asking over and over again what happens when a mother is unable to breastfeed or when a baby is unable to latch on. The mother would be transferred to a medical facility, where the breastfeeding problem would be assessed and corrected, they said. But this is so rare, that it didn’t really register on their radar as a major issue to be dealt with, like it is in North America where so few women meet their own breastfeeding goals.

The Booby Traps

With such high breastfeeding success rates in Bangladesh, does that mean there are no booby traps? No, in fact there are a few…

  • Perceived low supply: When the MaMoni project was rolled out in some regions in Bangladesh, they found that a lot of moms were introducing solids early because they thought they had insufficient milk — low supply. Because moms thought that they didn’t have enough milk, they introduced solids too early, which did lead to lower supply and insufficient nutrition for their babies because the nutrition the babies were getting from the solids wasn’t comparable to what they were getting from breastmilk. They had to teach mothers to follow good breastfeeding practices (e.g. initiating breastfeeding within one hour of birth, nursing on demand, etc.) and then trust their own bodies to make the milk that their babies needed and to wait until six months to introduce other foods.
  • Mother-in-law factor: I spoke to one woman who was breastfeeding her seven month old. She said breastfeeding was going well. I asked if she had introduced any other foods yet. She said that she hadn’t and when I asked why not, she said that her mother-in-law didn’t think it was time yet. The mother-in-law plays a very strong role in decision making in some of these homes, so even new mothers who have been educated on ideal breastfeeding practices come up against resistance in their own homes as a result. With the younger generation being better educated about breastfeeding through the MaMoni project, hopefully this is something that will be phased out within 10 to 20 years.
  • Which foods to introduce: Food is often scarce for families in Bangladesh. When there isn’t enough food to go around, it is often the mother and the infant who go without or who are left with less nutritious foods (e.g. only rice instead of rice, vegetable and animal protein). Mothers have to be taught the importance of giving animal protein and other foods that are rich in nutrients to their infants and toddlers once they have started solids. Exclusive breastfeeding is critical for the first six months, but after that it is important to ensure the baby gets a variety of foods from the family table and not just simple grains. Nutrition during the first 1000 days is critical to that child’s health and success in life.
  • When to wean: Part of the breastfeeding education program in Bangladesh involves repeating over and over again the message that babies should be breastfed exclusively for six months with continued breastfeeding for two years. I mentioned above that the average age of weaning in Bangladesh is 33 months. Given that the natural age of weaning from an anthropological perspective is around 4.2 years (with a range of 2.5 years to 7 years), I was concerned that these mothers were being taught that they had to wean at two years, which would be both earlier than they traditionally did and earlier than the anthropologically natural weaning age. The official language used in breastfeeding policies reads that breastfeeding should continue for up to two years or beyond, but when I spoke to mothers about weaning they said that they weaned at age two. I asked if that was initiated by the baby or by the mother and they said it was mother-led.

There has been a lot of success in addressing these booby traps in the areas that the MaMoni project and other initiatives have been implemented. In fact, the rate of exclusive breastfeeding for six months increased from 43% in 2007 to 64% in 2012 (by comparison, in Canada and the United States it hovers at around 15%). So how do they do it?

Breastfeeding Education in the MaMoni Project

Breastfeeding Pamphlet - MaMoni Bangladesh

Given the high infant and child malnutrition rates in Bangladesh (41% of children under 5 are stunted), one of the main priorities of the MaMoni project is to improve breastfeeding practices. Although almost all women breastfeed, they want to ensure that they are doing it in a way that ensures the highest level of success for the mother and the infant.

There are a number of ways that they do this:

  • They speak to the mother about breastfeeding during her pregnancy
  • They teach the mother about appropriate breastfeeding techniques and positioning through group meetings, pamphlets and one-on-one visits with new mothers
  • They visit and check-in with the mother regularly to see how things are going and to provide any additional support that is needed

Photo credit: Shafiqul Alam Kiron/Save the Children

Photo credit: Shafiqul Alam Kiron/Save the Children

The support is provided through health professionals at the local health center, such as the birth center and walk-in clinic that I wrote about on my blog. It is also provided through community volunteers who are given training in breastfeeding and infant care and nutrition. These volunteers go into the homes of new mothers to give them additional hands-on support. On top of that, there are community action groups that discuss any health and nutrition problems in the community and work together to come up with solutions and to educate people. The pride that the health workers and volunteers have in the work that they are doing is inspiring. They know what a huge difference they are making in the health of their own communities.

Community Action Group - Bangladesh

Formula Marketing and WHO Code Violations

People who are familiar with the history of the WHO Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes will know that formula companies have a horrible history of predatory formula marketing practices in developing countries that has resulted in many, many baby deaths due to malnutrition or infection from dirty water.

In the past, WHO Code violations have been a big problem in Bangladesh. In 1997, Joanna Moorhead wrote about the way that formula companies were trying to undermine the work of breastfeeding campaigners in the country. In a country that previously had healthy breastfed babies, hospitals were suddenly full of infants who were dying from diarrhea because they were being fed formula made with dirty water instead of being breastfed. This type of thing didn’t happen before formula companies started marketing aggressively in the country.

The aggressive marketing is often directed at health care providers, who are given “information” about formula and often end up suggesting it to new mothers who are having trouble with breastfeeding instead of getting them breastfeeding support. “Just try formula” ends up being the answer, instead of addressing the breastfeeding problem.

Whether that is the case or not depends greatly on the region and who is active there. In cities like Dhaka, women are more likely to come across a formula pushing doctor and be able to buy formula in stores. In rural villages, like some of the ones I visited, the health professionals would never suggest formula and it isn’t even available in local stores or affordable to those families. The formula companies are smart enough not to chase after dollars that are not there.

In Dhaka, I went into a typical supermarket and checked out the formula containers. There were no glaring WHO Code violations (like the promotions and pictures of happy formula drinking babies on the cans that we see here in North America). There was some plain packaging (which was encouraging to see) and some that seemed to be skirting ever so slightly on the edge of the WHO Code (e.g. instead of a prohibited picture of a baby, they would put a picture of a baby’s stuffed animal).

infant formula bangladesh

infant formula bangladesh

Reading Moorhead’s article and speaking to Save the Children and MaMoni project staff in Bangladesh, it was obvious that there is a constant underground battle between the breastfeeding advocacy of non-governmental organizations and the government and the underhanded secretive tactics used by formula companies to try to influence health professionals and increase their indirect access to moms.

Where to from here?

In countries like Bangladesh, breastfeeding continues to be an important life or death issue for infants. While we know a lot about the health benefits of breastfeeding in North American and the risks of not breastfeeding, most babies are not at risk of death if their mother doesn’t breastfeed. In Bangladesh and many other developing countries, there is nothing more critical for infant survival than ensuring moms are able to exclusively breastfeed for six months.

That means that despite a 98% breastfeeding rate, there is still work to be done. Work to maintain that rate as the country’s wealth increases and the formula companies continue to be more aggressive and work to ensure the best possible breastfeeding practices so that every mom can successfully nurse her baby.

You can learn more about Save the Children Canada’s health and nutrition programs for mothers and children and find out how you can get involved.

Annie has been blogging about the art and science of parenting on the PhD in Parenting Blog since May 2008. She is a social, political and consumer advocate on issues of importance to parents, women and children. She uses her blog as a platform to create awareness and to advocate for change, calling out the government, corporations, media and sometimes other bloggers for positions, policies and actions that threaten the rights and well-being of parents and their children.

 



Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...


9 Comments | Last revised on 10/28/2012


This entry was posted in Advocacy, Blog, Booby Traps, Empower, Inspire, Main Content and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to 98% of Babies Are Breastfed in Bangladesh — Does That Mean There Are No Booby Traps?

  1. Cassandra says:

    As for the part about stating that a mother-in-law advising a woman not to give her seven month old other foods being a booby trap… Actually in an area like this where it may be hard to get a hold of nutritious solids for the baby it is better for her to breastfeed exclusively for at least a year instead of introducing solids at six months. Not only are new studies finding that the digestive tracts of babies are not always ready for other foods at six months (more like eight or nine months is the earliest) but I personally have a baby that is off the charts with her growth and supremely healthy – she is eleven months old and still gets all her food and drinks from the breast. And I don’t even eat a balanced diet like I should so that isn’t a factor in this.

    • Annie @ PhD in Parenting says:

      Thanks for the comment, Cassandra.

      The situation in countries like Bangladesh is different than in first world countries. Forty-one percent of children under five are stunted in Bangladesh. Their mothers aren’t simply not eating a balanced diet (like you). They are often severely malnourished.

      Poor breastfeeding practices, early introduction of solids, late introduction of solids, and introducing the wrong types of solids have all been shown to be linked to severe nutrient deficiencies for children under the age of two.

      Mothers in Bangladesh need to be taught the importance of prioritizing the baby’s access to foods rich in Vitamin A and animal proteins. If they have limited access to those foods, the baby needs to be given priority to ensure proper brain development and growth. It is easier / less dangerous for an older child to not have access to meat/eggs than fr the baby to not have access to those foods.

  2. Tanya Lieberman, IBCLC says:

    What a wonderful post, and what an incredible opportunity! I’m very jealous. :)

    In the first section on common responses to the statistic you shared about breastfeeding rates, I had a third reaction, which was “I’m so glad they never lost the tradition of breastfeeding (in other words, they didn’t have to ‘create’ it, it’s just the way things have always been and it wasn’t ever taken away), and I hope it can be protected.”

    I wonder if the idea of mothers being “forced” to breastfeed because they can’t afford a less healthy alternative doesn’t give moms in the culture enough credit. Yes, breastfeeding rates tend to decline with affluence in developing countries, but moms without the means to formula feed will also tell you that it’s better for the baby. So maybe they’re making an affirmative “choice” of their one option. Sounds nonsensical, and I don’t mean to trivialize the dire straits these women are in, but do you know what I mean?

    • You’re absolutely right Tanya. I think the formula companies are working very hard to change this and to have formula become normal enough in countries like Bangladesh that it does start becoming something that women consider a reasonable alternative (much like processed convenience food is here too).

      Most moms in Bangladesh are certainly not in a position to be able to afford formula and if they had some extra money, I certainly don’t think it would be something they’d be adding to their shopping list. I think there are many other things that would take priority.

      Why mess with something that is working for virtually everyone?

  3. anne marie benoit says:

    women here in Canada should be encourage as well to breastfeed and also to stay home like not have to rush to work after giving birth.

  4. Pam @writewrds says:

    It’s pretty frightening to think formula companies are acting in such a way that the lives of infants may be put at risk. Unbelievable.
    It would seem to me that a longer time spent breastfeeding, combined with improved maternal nutrition, would help address stunting. Hopefully.
    The contrast is so stark. Here, breastfeeding is a health and social issue. There it’s an issue of life and death.
    What’s fascinating, as well, is the influence of the MIL. That doesn’t seem so far removed from comments you hear from mothers in Canada, about how the opinions of others were so powerful (not always in a good way)– at a time of vulnerability and confusion.

  5. Elizabeth says:

    Look a little closer at your data. 98% of Bangladeshi babies are PARTIALLY breastfeed. More than a third are supplementing by 6 months. In a country where alternatives are few and limited and breastfeeding is readily accepted, if more than a third are supplementing, maybe breastfeeding is not the magical foolproof thing you all think it is. Maybe privileged white people are not the only ones imagining supply problems — we’re just the ones with medical care to detect the problems and good alternatives for infant nutrition.

    Also, even if not all underfed babies tick up the infant mortality figures, there could well be a number of babies who are surviving on suboptimal nutrition.

  6. Elizabeth says:

    (98% are *at least* partially breastfed, I mean.)

  7. Pingback: Attachment Parenting International | Attachment Parenting in Bangladesh – Guest Post by Annie Urban

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>