It’s Not a “Nanny State,” It’s a Booby Trap Nation!

By now, you’ve probably heard Minnesota Representative Michele Bachmann’s inaccurate and inflammatory quote about the IRS ruling reversal that allows breast pumps and pump supplies tax-sheltered status: “I’ve given birth to five babies and I breast-fed every single one,” Bachmann said. “To think that government has to go out and buy my breast pump. … That’s the new definition of a nanny state.”

We know that this is simply wrong, and that “tax-sheltered” doesn’t mean “government-purchased.” It means that moms can purchase pumps and pump supplies through health spending accounts or that they can deduct the costs of those products when they file itemized income taxes. (For a clear explanation of the tax break for moms, see this post.)

Instead of opting to correct Bachmann’s statement or focusing on an explanation of what the new ruling means, the story quickly deteriorates into fodder for the Mommy Wars.



Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

This entry was posted in Advocacy and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to It’s Not a “Nanny State,” It’s a Booby Trap Nation!

  1. Wouldn’t this help to encourage moms to breastfeed longer? The extended breastfeeding benefits are numerous, and knowing that any “supplies” bought toward this can be a tax deduction, should encourage moms to keep on with it. I hope at least! Of course, I suppose it only helps those with good insurance plans. Those on medicaid won’t benefit really from this, but then maybe the government will offer supplies (I’ve seen WIC offer breast pumps to moms in need!)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>